The Stevens Archive
Unresolved questions — McMillen's second pilot, the date of death discrepancy, and further research leads
Good research is honest about what it does not know. Three significant questions remain unresolved in the Stevens research. They are documented here precisely because a future discovery — a letter, a record, a conversation — might answer them.
This is the central unresolved question of the research.
Alan Cooper’s Wot No Engines? (Woodfield Publishing, ISBN 1-903953-18-9, pp.164–165) contains an account of Captain McMillen’s glider during Operation VARSITY. The book describes McMillen’s second pilot as an RAF pilot.
Interpretation A — Different man (the book is correct):
Interpretation B — Same man, author error:
If John was McMillen’s second pilot, we have a detailed published account of his final flight — what happened inside that glider, how it came down, and what occurred in the immediate aftermath. If he was not, that account belongs to another man entirely.
The permanent CWGC headstone at Reichswald Forest War Cemetery reads:
“26th March 1945”
The correct date of death is 24 March 1945 — the day of the VARSITY landing, confirmed by the battlefield cross photograph (“24.3.45”), the Pegasus Archive casualty roll, and John Arthur Stevens’s 2017 research from forces-war-records.co.uk.
The discrepancy likely arose during the post-war reinterment and headstone registration process. Mrs Minnie Stevens was asked to complete paperwork in 1950 — five years after the event — and an administrative error may have entered the record at that stage.
The CWGC can correct headstone inscriptions where documentary evidence supports the correction. This has not yet been pursued.
John’s contemporary newspaper obituary states that his Commanding Officer wrote to his mother following his death. This letter — if it survives — would be an extraordinary primary source: an eyewitness account of John’s service and character from his commanding officer, written within weeks of his death.
The letter has not been located. It may exist across one of the three family branches — Stevens, Charmans, or Lords.
The following offline avenues have not yet been pursued and represent the most productive remaining lines of inquiry: